Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Westlake Sport SA-37 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake Sport SA-37 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Westlake (22%). The first tyre test of Westlake Sport SA-37 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Sport SA-37 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested.
| # | Westlake Sport SA-37
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry steering response
Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Westlake Sport SA-37 | 188 | 81 | 107 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Test winner | 264 | vítěz testu | 137 | 127 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
