Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Vredestein (55%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 74% compared to 50% of the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 were tested.
# | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary
2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | ||||
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |