Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Vredestein (55%). The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Potenza S001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Potenza S001 were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
