Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Premium2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta vs. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Nankang (41%). Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Ultrac Sessanta and the Sportnex AS-2+ were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient2. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient2. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | velmi dobré | 100 | 101,1 | 130,3 | 102,4 | 100 |
| Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Rating: Sufficient | 89,8 | dostatečné | 86,6 | 93,1 | 89,5 | 101,1 | 73,3 |
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Rating: Sufficient | 88,7 | dostatečné | 85,6 | 91,8 | 88,7 | 100,4 | 80,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
