Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Vredestein (55%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Sportrac 5 and Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Sportrac 5 and the Proxes CF2 SUV were tested.
| # | Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 137 | doporučeno | 54 | 47 | 16 | 6 | |
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 127 | podmíněně doporučeno | 42 | 44 | 17 | 9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
