Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Vredestein (57%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 52% of the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2024 215/50 R18 test, where both the Quatrac Pro+ and the CrossClimate 2 SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Quatrac Pro+ is made - Hungary.
| # | Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 62 | 66 | 52 | 26 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Rating: Recommended | 51 | 55 | 44 | 16 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 62 | 58 | 44 | 26 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Rating: Good | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
