Segment
1. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Viking (45%). In this particular case, the Nokian Seasonproof has a better rating of 66% compared to 45% of the Viking Fourtech. The first tyre test of Viking Fourtech was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Seasonproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fourtech and the Seasonproof were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Viking Fourtech
| Nokian Seasonproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
1. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
1. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vítěz testu | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |
Viking Fourtech Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2- | |
Nokian Seasonproof Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 1- | 2+ | 2- | 1- | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
Nokian Seasonproof | 41,4 | 53,5 | |||||
Show test details |