Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
# | Viking Fourtech
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we're comparing two tyres: the Viking Fourtech and the Continental AllSeasonContact. These are both 'allround' tyres produced by Viking and Continental respectively.
The Viking Fourtech has been rated at 32% by us. It's well-featured, particularly when it comes to rolling resistance and cross Aquaplaning. This was reflected in its performance in checks by Autobild, where it ranked 15th out of 27 tyres tested. It's a sturdy tyre, but doesn't lead the pack.
On the other hand, we've rated the Continental AllSeasonContact significantly higher, at 76%. Manufactured in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and France, it's a strong performer, with a particularly high ranking in the Autobild tests, where it deftly outclassed the Viking Fourtech by achieving the 5th position among 27 tyres. The Continental AllSeasonContact excels in snow performance, including braking and cornering, offers excellent comfort, and showcases compelling proficiency in Aquaplaning.
According to autobild 2020 test summary for Continental AllSeasonContact, this tyre stands apart as a truly convincing 'allround' talent, offering superb winter qualities and an overall excellent price-to-performance ratio. It delivers excellent Aquaplaning properties, precise steering behaviour, high mileage, and fuel-saving rolling resistance. This makes it a top-choice tyre for those looking for strong all-weather performance.
Verdict: If top-tier performance and durability are your priorities, the Continental AllSeasonContact is the superior choice. However, if you're eyeing a more budget-friendly option that doesn't compromise on steady baseline features, the Viking Fourtech can be a feasible alternative. Do note, as per our comparison, the Continental AllSeasonContact simply outclasses the Viking Fourtech whether it's snow performance, comfort, Aquaplaning or fuel efficiency.
Please note, no newer tyres have replaced these models yet. Therefore both Viking Fourtech and Continental AllSeasonContact continue to be solid options for an allround tyre.
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vítěz testu | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |
Viking Fourtech Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2- | |
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,3 | 53 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
Viking Fourtech | 45,3 | 51 | |||||
Continental AllSeasonContact | 43 | 48,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Viking Fourtech | 46 | 53,5 | |||||
Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,6 | 49,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
Viking Fourtech | 47,4 | 50,8 | |||||
Continental AllSeasonContact | 43,4 | 48,6 | |||||
Show test details |