Segment
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 and Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SNOW MAX 2 and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested.
| # | Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,1 | 4,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
