Segment
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SNOW MAX 2 and the PorTran CW51 were tested.
| # | Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,1 | 4,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
