Segment
1. Tristar Ecopower 4 Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Tristar (42%). In this particular case, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 has a better rating of 71% compared to 42% of the Tristar Ecopower 4. The first tyre test of Tristar Ecopower 4 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Fulda EcoControl HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecopower 4 and the EcoControl HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Tristar Ecopower 4
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Tristar Ecopower 4 Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Conditionally recommended
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Conditionally recommended
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Tristar Ecopower 4 | 39,5 | 32,1 | |||||
Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | ||
Tristar Ecopower 4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 46 | 40 | 16 | 6 | ||
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 55 | 46 | 16 | 6 | ||
Show test details |