Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Toyo (60%). The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the Proxes CF2 SUV and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Proxes CF2 SUV is made in Japan and WetProof is made in Finland.
# | Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi dobré + | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: - | doporučeno - | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
Nokian WetProof Rating: Good + | dobré + | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,8 | doporučeno | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | ||
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 6,5 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6,0 | 7,1 | 7,2 | ||
Nokian WetProof Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | doporučeno | 9,0 | 9,0 | 6,5 | ||
Show test details |