Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Tomket Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Tomket Sport vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Tomket) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Tomket (11%). In this particular case, the Vredestein ULTRAC has a better rating of 26% compared to 11% of the Tomket Sport. The first tyre test of Tomket Sport was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Vredestein ULTRAC first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Sport and the ULTRAC were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Tomket Sport
| Vredestein ULTRAC
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Tomket Sport 16.
Worst position in test
2. Tomket Sport 49.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Tomket Sport Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Tomket Sport Sufficient2. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Tomket Sport | 38,6 | 33,3 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Tomket Sport | 95,6 | 93,2 | 97,9 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 101,3 | 103,3 | 99,2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
