Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Tomket Sport 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Tomket Sport 3 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Tomket) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Tomket (11%). The first tyre test of Tomket Sport 3 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/45 R18 test, where both the Sport 3 and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Tomket Sport 3
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | Not available in 165/70 R14 (change) | Not available in 165/70 R14 (change) | |
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Tomket Sport 3 18.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Tomket Sport 3 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 2- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
