Segment
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle2. Tomket Allyear 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Tomket Allyear 3 vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Tomket) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Tomket (1%). The first tyre test of Tomket Allyear 3 was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 test, where both the Allyear 3 and the EuroALL Season AS210 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Tomket Allyear 3
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | |||||
| Tomket Allyear 3 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 1 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Tomket Allyear 3 | 42,9 | 63,7 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,2 | 50,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
