Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Sunny NA305 Lowcost
Comparison: Sunny NA305 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Asia (prob. China) (Sunny) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Sunny (8%). The first tyre test of Sunny NA305 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Teknikens 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the NA305 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested.
| # | Sunny NA305
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R50 - R55 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Sunny NA305 70%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Sunny NA305 70%
Wet handling
2. Sunny NA305 70%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Sunny NA305 70%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
2. Sunny NA305 10%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
2. Sunny NA305 80%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Sunny NA305 | 42 | 21 | 12 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 57 | 24 | 17 | 6 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
