Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Starfire W200 Lowcost
Comparison: Starfire W200 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Starfire) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Starfire (1%). But when it comes to comparing Starfire W200 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Starfire W200 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the W200 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested.
| # | Starfire W200
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R15 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Worst position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Starfire W200 | 42,6 | - | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 39,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||