Segment
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
Comparison: Sava TRENTA M+S vs. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Uniroyal (60%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the SNOW MAX 2 were tested.
| # | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,1 | 4,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
