Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
Comparison: Sava TRENTA M+S vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho PorTran CW51 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
