Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Sava (67%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Sava TRENTA M+S was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental VanContact Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Continental VanContact Winter has B rating.
# | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |