Segment
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Table of contents:
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Maxxis Victra Sport 5 are two tyres being compared. These two models can be considered as contenders in the summer tyre market. The comparison will shed light on their strengths and weaknesses, based on various tests conducted.
Starting with the Sava Intensa UHP 2, it follows its predecessor, Sava Intensa UHP, but brings enhancements according to the needs of its users. This tyre is known for its short dry braking distance and low rolling resistance, making it efficient, especially in dry conditions. However, it tends to understeer during wet or dry handling and has a moderate aquaplaning reserve, as highlighted by Autobild. This model enjoys a rating of 67% on our website, and it stands at the 28th position among 50 tyres tested by Autobild. Moreover, it occupied the 6th spot in the ADAC test with aquaplaning - cross, fuel efficiency, and mileage credited as its best features.
On the other hand, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 stands a notch higher, with an overall rating of 69%. Produced by Maxxis, a Chinese company, this tyre shows certain distinct characteristics. Good safety reserves during aquaplaning and a secure and dynamic wet handling rightly point out its strengths. However, average tread life and noticeably delayed steering behaviour are reported as drawbacks by Autobild. When tested among other tyres, it ranked 20th out of 50 in the Autobild test and scored 4th out of 16 in the ADAC test. The highlights of the tyre in the ADAC test were its performance in aquaplaning - cross, mileage, noise, and wet circle cornering.
To summarize, both tyres present their unique features and serviceability. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 attracts users looking for short dry braking distances and low rolling resistance. In contrast, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 appeals more to those who prioritise safety during aquaplaning and prefer dynamic wet handling. However, on an overall basis, considering all test statistics and performances, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 marginally outperforms the Sava Intensa UHP 2 in our comparisons.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 33.9 | 29.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vynikající | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | |||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 60.8 | 26.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 34,8 | 33,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,8 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,4 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
