Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than BFGoodrich (50%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 68% compared to 67% of the Sava Intensa UHP 2. The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Intensa UHP 2 and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Sava Intensa UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.
# | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.312. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.75
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | |||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
Show test details |