Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage
Table of contents:
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In our extensive tyre comparison, we delve into the details of two summer tyres–the Sava Intensa UHP 2 coming from Sava and the BFGoodrich Advantage presented by BFGoodrich. We scrutinize their performance, safety, and overall strengths and weaknesses based on our ratings and multiple tests conducted by reputed organizations.
The Sava Intensa UHP 2, a follow-up of the previous model Sava Intensa UHP, stands out for its exceptional security reserves, particularly regarding aquaplaning. Its stability on dry pavements plus the short wet and dry braking distances earned it notable points. The tyre gained appreciation for its good comfort and budget-friendly price. However, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 has a restricted lifespan. In Autobild's test out of 51 tyres, it clinched the 15th position, implying a fairly commendable performance.
On the other side, the BFGoodrich Advantage shows a robust performance on dry tracks with short braking distances, and it stands out for its comfortable and quiet ride. However, its handling under wet conditions could be improved as it showed understeer and longer braking distances. Out of the 51 tyres in Autobild's test, this tyre managed to secure the 20th position.
Our reviews pegged the Sava Intensa UHP 2 at a 67% rating, and BFGoodrich Advantage just a notch higher at 68%. Despite the close rating, the two tires have their unique strengths. The Intensa UHP 2 stands out for its safety in aquaplaning scenarios and price point, while the BFGoodrich Advantage is known for its ride comfort and handling on dry surfaces.
In summary, choosing between these two boils down to your specific requirements and driving conditions. If aquaplaning security and budget are your top priorities, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 makes a solid choice. If lone dry-surface performance and comfort matter more to you, the BFGoodrich Advantage should be right up your alley. It's noteworthy to mention that these two models haven't been replaced by newer versions.
Remember to delve deep into our comprehensive reviews and tests before making a purchase decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36.2 | 31.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
