• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than BFGoodrich (50%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 68% compared to 67% of the Sava Intensa UHP 2. The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Intensa UHP 2 and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Sava Intensa UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.

# Sava Intensa UHP 2
/67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/68%

Add to comparison

Sava
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR17 - R20 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32.627.4
Sava Intensa UHP 235.934.4
BFGoodrich Advantage36.231.9
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné12+1+
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Rating: Good
dobré222-
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
dobré2-2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Sava Intensa UHP 236,329,8
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Show test details