• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than BFGoodrich (50%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 68% compared to 67% of the Sava Intensa UHP 2. The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Intensa UHP 2 and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Sava Intensa UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.

# Sava Intensa UHP 2
/67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/68%

Add to comparison

Sava
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR17 - R20 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné12+1+
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Rating: Good
dobré222-
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
dobré2-2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Sava Intensa UHP 236,329,8
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Show test details