Segment
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Viking (58%). The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Viking WinTech first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the WinTech were tested.
# | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Viking WinTech
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.22. Viking WinTech 22.8
1. Viking WinTech Recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Viking WinTech Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,1 |
Show test details |