Segment
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Uniroyal (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the MS plus 77 were tested.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.212. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 41,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
