Segment
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nankang (27%). The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Winter Activa SV-3 were tested.
# | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R12 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 Lowcost
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,7 | 2,5 | 5,5 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
Show test details |