Segment
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Sava (67%). The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,1 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 3,3 | 1,9 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
