Segment
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Kristall Montero 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 also have C wet ratings.
# | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Show test details |