Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Sava (67%). The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
