Segment
1. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Sailun (49%). In this particular case, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 has a better rating of 67% compared to 49% of the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2. The first tyre test of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Atrezzo ZSR 2 and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 | 34.3 | 28.7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
