Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Sailun (49%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 68% compared to 49% of the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2. The first tyre test of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Atrezzo ZSR 2 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 | 34.3 | 28.7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
