14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Rotalla (3%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the SETULA S-PACE RU01 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /83%

Dimensions		R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 261

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 0

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 6x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 9.

Worst position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 50.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 29.17

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

80%

Rotalla
SETULA S-PACE RU01

64

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 98%

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 48%

Wet circle cornering

1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 96%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 61%

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 76%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

91%

Rotalla
SETULA S-PACE RU01

85

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 94%

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 78%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

74%

Rotalla
SETULA S-PACE RU01

73

Exterior noise

1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 80%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 72%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

52%

Rotalla
SETULA S-PACE RU01

32

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	264	137	129
Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01	184	76	108
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Test winner	264	vítěz testu	137	127
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01	37,2	35,7
Continental PremiumContact 6	33,2	30,2
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	dobré	1,7	1,3	2,8	2,0	1,6
Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Rating: Sufficient	dostatečné	3,6	2,9	2,8	2,0	1,6
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	dobré	1,7	2,4	3,6	2,0	2,1
Show test details

Comparison: Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands