Segment
1. Rotalla RH 01 Lowcost2. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost
Comparison: Rotalla RH 01 vs. Viking Protech NewGen
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Viking summer tyres are slightly better rated (26%) than Rotalla (3%). The first tyre test of Rotalla RH 01 was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Viking Protech NewGen first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the RH 01 and the Protech NewGen were tested.
| # | Rotalla RH 01
| Viking Protech NewGen
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Rotalla RH 01 44.
Worst position in test
1. Rotalla RH 01 44.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
1. Rotalla RH 01 67%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Rotalla RH 01 66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Rotalla RH 01 76%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Rotalla RH 01 79%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Rotalla RH 01 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Rotalla RH 01 65%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | |||||
| Rotalla RH 01 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 3,2 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,5 | 3,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
