Segment
1. Rotalla RH 01 Lowcost2. Tomket Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Rotalla RH 01 vs. Tomket Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Tomket). Generally, Tomket summer tyres are slightly better rated (11%) than Rotalla (3%). The first tyre test of Rotalla RH 01 was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Tomket Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the RH 01 and the Sport were tested.
| # | Rotalla RH 01
| Tomket Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
1. Tomket Sport 16.2. Rotalla RH 01 44.
Worst position in test
1. Rotalla RH 01 44.2. Tomket Sport 49.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Tomket Sport Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Tomket Sport Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Rotalla RH 01 76%2. Tomket Sport 73%
Wet braking
1. Rotalla RH 01 67%2. Tomket Sport 63%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Rotalla RH 01 66%2. Tomket Sport 49%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Tomket Sport 79%2. Rotalla RH 01 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Tomket Sport 85%2. Rotalla RH 01 79%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | |||||
| Rotalla RH 01 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 3,2 | |||||
| Tomket Sport Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,3 | 3,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
