Segment
1. Riken Snow Lowcost
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Riken winter tyres are slightly better rated (7%) than Austone (6%). In this particular case, the Riken Snow has a better rating of 7% compared to 6% of the Austone SP901. The first tyre test of Riken Snow was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Austone SP901 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snow and the SP901 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Riken Snow
| Austone SP901
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Riken Snow Lowcost
2. Riken Snow 31.
1. Riken Snow 43.2. Austone SP901 52.
1. Austone SP901 22.2
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Riken Snow | 40.8 | - | |||||
Austone SP901 | 45.7 | - | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Riken Snow | 39,1 | - | |||||
Austone SP901 | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Riken Snow | 39,2 | ||||||
Austone SP901 | 41,2 | ||||||
Show test details |