Segment
1. Riken Road Performance Lowcost2. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Westlake Z-107
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Riken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake). The first tyre test of Riken Road Performance was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Westlake Z-107 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the Z-107 were tested.
| # | Riken Road Performance | Westlake Z-107 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Westlake Z-107 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||