Segment
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Pirelli (53%). The first tyre test of Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Winter Sottozero 3 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter Sottozero 3 is made in Italy and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,3 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,6 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1102 | 301,21 | 501,21 | 202,4 | 109,6 | ||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 1013 | 262,15 | 448,85 | 202,4 | 100 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 1097 | 300,69 | 497,39 | 196,8 | 102,4 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 35,2 | 25,8 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 2,7 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | 3+ | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,9 | ||||||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Good | 7,0 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | 8,8 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 31,3 | 26,4 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Show test details |