Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium
Comparison: Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Pirelli Cinturato Winter has a better rating of 63% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. The first tyre test of Pirelli Cinturato Winter was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 185/65 R15 test, where both the Cinturato Winter and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Pirelli Cinturato Winter dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (73%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Cinturato Winter is made in Russian Federation and Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland.
| # | Pirelli Cinturato Winter | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 206 | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: Conditionally recommended | 177 | 56 | 59 | 36 | 14 | 2 | 6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 182 | 58 | 53 | 43 | 15 | 6 | 7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 96,9 | 99,8 | 99 | 100 | 100 | |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 99,3 | 93,4 | 98,35 | 97,9 | 85,5 | 98,7 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 98,4 | 95,6 | 96 | 94,9 | 85,6 | 99,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 36,2 | 26,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: Highly recommended | 378 | 138 | 101 | 139 | 15 | 9 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 341 | 100 | 114 | 127 | 19 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,4 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||