Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Pirelli (70%). But when it comes to comparing Pirelli CARRIER and Fulda Conveo Tour 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the CARRIER and the Conveo Tour 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 58% of Pirelli CARRIER dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Fulda Conveo Tour 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Pirelli CARRIER
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | |
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
