Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V107
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2023 when was the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R18 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
