Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Nokian WetProof
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WetProof also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.642. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian zLine 80%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
