Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Nokian Powerproof
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian Powerproof has a better rating of 71% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine | Nokian Powerproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian Powerproof 72 dB2. Nokian zLine ? dB