Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (57%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 81% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (88%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian zLine ? dB