Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Firestone Roadhawk 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
