Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Barum (39%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2020 when was the Barum Bravuris 5 HM first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Bravuris 5 HM has B rating.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
