Segment
1. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the Azenis FK510 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
