• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has a better rating of 69% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has B rating. We also know where WR SUV 4 is made - Russian Federation.

# Nokian WR SUV 4
/26%
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
/69%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Goodyear
DimensionsR16 - R21 R16 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test386143138118
Nokian WR SUV 4347107133107
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
Rating: Highly recommended
352122129101
Show test details
Offroad
Name WetDrySnowIce
Best values in test12+12+
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Highly recommended
2-1-1-1-
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
Rating: Highly recommended
1 2+ 2+2+
Show test details
Offroad
Name WetDrySnowIce
Best values in test2+2+1-1
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Test winner
22+ 1- 2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
Rating: Highly recommended
2231-
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+1
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Good
2-2-1
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
Rating: Exemplary
1- 22+
Show test details