Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 82% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 89% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating. We also know where WR SUV 4 is made - Russian Federation.
# | Nokian WR SUV 4
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 100%
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 1- | |
Show test details |