• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 82% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 89% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating. We also know where WR SUV 4 is made - Russian Federation.

# Nokian WR SUV 4
/26%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
/82%

Add to comparison

Nokian
GoodYear
DimensionsR16 - R21 R15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in testpříkladné1-2111
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-2-2+2-2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 1- 2 2+21-
Show test details