Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 65% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation and Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy.
# | Nokian WR SUV 4
| Firestone Winterhawk 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 100%
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 4 | 347 | 107 | 133 | 107 | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 363 | velmi doporučeno | 125 | 123 | 115 | ||
Show test details |