Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Falken (44%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR SUV 4 has a better rating of 26% compared to 10% of the Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the EUROWINTER HS01 SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation and EUROWINTER HS01 SUV is made in Turkey.
# | Nokian WR SUV 4
| Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 3- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 4 | 347 | 107 | 133 | 107 | |||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 SUV | 309 | 99 | 110 | 100 | |||
Show test details |