• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Falken (44%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 4 and Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the EUROWINTER HS01 SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation and EUROWINTER HS01 SUV is made in Turkey.

# Nokian WR SUV 4
/0%
Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV
/0%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Falken
DimensionsR16 - R21 R16 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test1-2111
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2-2+2-2
Falken EuroWinter HS01 SUV
Rating: Satisfactory
2+3-2+2-2
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test386143138118
Nokian WR SUV 4347107133107
Falken EuroWinter HS01 SUV30999110100
Show test details