Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 65% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 4 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 | 347 | 107 | 133 | 107 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 386 | 143 | 136 | 107 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||