• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.

# Nokian WR SUV 4
/26%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
/87%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Bridgestone
DimensionsR16 - R21 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in testpříkladné1-2111
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-2-2+2-2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Good
dobré1- 2 2+1-2+
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test386143138118
Nokian WR SUV 4347107133107
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Highly recommended
386 velmi doporučeno 143 136107
Show test details